Head & Shoulders
Learn more about our scoring →
About Head & Shoulders
Head & Shoulders stands as one of America's most recognizable haircare brands, holding market leadership in the anti-dandruff category for over six decades. Founded in 1961, the brand has built its reputation on clinically proven formulations featuring zinc pyrithione technology, establishing itself as the go-to solution for scalp health across global markets.
As part of Procter & Gamble's extensive beauty portfolio, Head & Shoulders benefits from corporate-level sustainability initiatives including science-based climate targets and comprehensive palm oil sourcing protocols. The brand's sustainability performance reflects this parent company infrastructure, particularly in areas of packaging innovation and supply chain transparency, while revealing gaps in independent animal welfare certifications and social impact programming.
The brand's sustainability journey showcases strong progress in packaging innovation with refillable systems and recycled content integration, supported by P&G's broader environmental commitments. However, Head & Shoulders faces challenges typical of mass-market haircare brands, including ingredient chemistry concerns related to aquatic safety and lack of independent verification for animal welfare claims, positioning it as a mainstream option with emerging sustainability credentials.
The Good Stuff
Where Head & Shoulders appears to be making meaningful progress. We cross-referenced these findings with multiple independent sources.
Innovative Refillable Packaging Systems
Demonstrates packaging leadership with refillable aluminum bottle systems launched across European markets and commitment to 100% recyclable or reusable packaging, including innovative beach plastic integration in HDPE bottles
Science-Based Climate Action
Backed by independently validated science-based targets through parent company infrastructure, supporting net-zero emissions commitments by 2040 with interim 65% reduction targets by 2030
Comprehensive Palm Oil Transparency
Achieves responsible sourcing through RSPO-certified palm oil with documented traceability covering over 98% of mills under comprehensive no deforestation, no peat, no exploitation policy via parent company P&G
The Reality Check
Areas where the publicly available data gets murky, incomplete, or concerning. We're transparent about the limitations of our analysis.
Lacks Independent Animal Welfare Verification
Claims no animal testing practices but lacks independent third-party certification from recognized organizations like PETA or Leaping Bunny, with no verified cruelty-free or vegan status across product lines
Brand-Level Social Impact Absence
No disclosed social impact programs or fair labor audit verification specific to Head & Shoulders operations, relying solely on general parent company human rights policies
Aquatic Safety Chemical Concerns
Core ingredient zinc pyrithione demonstrates documented aquatic toxicity concerns with formulations not aligned with green chemistry standards for environmental safety
Head & Shoulders'
Impact Aura
A visual representation of Head & Shoulders' positive impact
across People, Planet and Animals
Each colored area represents the brand's performance in that sustainability category. The size and intensity of each blob corresponds to their score—larger, more vibrant areas indicate stronger performance.
Our Research
Key findings from our comprehensive analysis of Head & Shoulders' sustainability performance across People, Planet & Animals impact.
Positive Impact on People
Research Highlights
- Supply chain transparency demonstrates RSPO-certified palm oil sourcing through parent company P&G with traceability covering over 98% of mills under no deforestation policy
- Ingredient safety disclosure includes zinc pyrithione and sulfate transparency with stated avoidance of parabens in preserving agents
- Labor practices rely on general parent company human rights policies without brand-specific fair labor audit verification
- Social impact programs remain undisclosed at brand level, limited to generic corporate citizenship references
- Marketing integrity claims include recyclable packaging and resource conservation without independent third-party verification
Evidence Strength
Strong documentation for supply chain transparency and palm sourcing protocols through parent company, limited verification for labor standards and social impact programs
Positive Impact on Planet
Research Highlights
- Climate action demonstrates science-based target validation through parent company with net-zero commitments by 2040 and 65% emissions reduction by 2030
- Packaging innovation includes 100% recyclable or reusable commitment by 2030, refillable aluminum bottle systems, and beach plastic integration in HDPE bottles
- Water stewardship initiatives have reached 700 million people with water-efficient products and manufacturing reduction targets of 20% per unit
- Biodiversity protection programs remain undisclosed with no evidence of brand-level habitat restoration or conservation initiatives identified
- Chemical responsibility concerns include zinc pyrithione formulations with documented aquatic toxicity not aligned with green chemistry standards
Evidence Strength
Excellent documentation for climate commitments and packaging innovation, significant gaps in biodiversity and chemical safety verification
Positive Impact on Animals
Research Highlights
- Animal testing practices lack independent third-party certification verification with no certification from PETA, Leaping Bunny, or similar organizations
- Vegan formulation status remains unverified with no brand-wide certification and undisclosed animal-derived components across product lines
- Wildlife conservation support shows no evidence of habitat funding, restoration programs, or biodiversity impact initiatives
- Sustainable sourcing demonstrates RSPO-certified palm oil compliance through parent company with no deforestation policies and comprehensive traceability systems
- Conservation funding programs are not disclosed at brand level with no evidence of wildlife or environmental grant initiatives
Evidence Strength
Strong documentation for sustainable sourcing protocols through parent company, limited verification for animal welfare practices and conservation commitments
See the Receipts
We don't just make claims—here are the official certifications that prove Head & Shoulders' sustainability commitments.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Head & Shoulders sustainable?
Head & Shoulders demonstrates mixed sustainability performance with notable strengths in packaging innovation and climate action through parent company Procter & Gamble's science-based targets. The brand shows leadership in refillable packaging systems and responsible palm oil sourcing, but faces challenges in independent animal welfare verification and brand-specific social impact programming.
Is Head & Shoulders cruelty-free?
Head & Shoulders is not independently certified as cruelty-free by recognized organizations like PETA or Leaping Bunny. While the brand claims no finished-product animal testing, it lacks third-party verification and may sell in markets where animal testing is required, making its cruelty-free status unverified.
Does Head & Shoulders have sustainable packaging?
Head & Shoulders leads in packaging sustainability with refillable aluminum bottle systems in European markets and commitment to 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2030. The brand incorporates beach plastic into HDPE bottles and supports parent company initiatives to eliminate virgin resin usage.
Is Head & Shoulders vegan?
Head & Shoulders is not certified as vegan and maintains limited transparency regarding animal-derived ingredients. The brand lacks comprehensive vegan formulation disclosure with unspecified fragrance components and potential animal-derived ingredients remaining undisclosed across product lines.
What are Head & Shoulders' climate commitments?
Head & Shoulders benefits from Procter & Gamble's independently validated science-based climate targets, including net-zero emissions commitments by 2040 and interim 65% reduction targets by 2030. These corporate-level initiatives support the brand's environmental impact reduction goals.
Is Head & Shoulders safe for the environment?
Head & Shoulders presents environmental safety challenges through core ingredient zinc pyrithione, which demonstrates documented aquatic toxicity concerns. While the brand achieves responsible sourcing in palm oil and packaging innovation, formulations remain misaligned with green chemistry environmental safety standards.
Does Head & Shoulders support conservation?
Head & Shoulders does not disclose brand-specific conservation funding programs or wildlife habitat restoration initiatives. Conservation support appears limited to broader corporate citizenship activities without dedicated environmental grant programs at the brand level.
Ready to Shop Head & Shoulders?
Find Head & Shoulders products through our trusted retail partners
Brands That Score Better
The Bottom Line
Head & Shoulders demonstrates selective sustainability leadership through packaging innovation and corporate-backed climate commitments while lacking independent verification for animal welfare claims and environmental safety standards. The brand's sustainability profile reflects typical mass-market haircare challenges, with strong infrastructure support from parent company initiatives but limited brand-specific transparency in social impact and conservation programming.